Acquittal Review Essay Example

Acquittal Review Paper Essay on Acquittal I read and thought, my God, Mr. Orlov, what you talking about? Really, What nonsense Bykov writes! Right. MARSH. Who can believe in camps someone wanted to build communism? NO real communism (or distorted or misunderstood or not, etc., etc. no) no one in the camps, nor even Stalin did not mean it-why it was (one for all that li?)? Top naively believe now ideological nonsense about Communism. Moreover, the belief in communism a special sort of religious consciousness (akin to belief in life after death and posthumous reward, for example, in ancient Egypt, see for example here.) Handy certain class of power coincides with gospartapparatom in its top part, to justify their rule. This, incidentally, is very correctly noted N. Korzhavin in the poem Tanka (available on this website in the Poetry!): Do you believe in the party. I believe clearly and strictly. Without a doubt. Absence of these extremely proud. And you do not seem that before so believe in God Too clear people around you then And thats what people have written, perfectly understands the danger of Stalinism in its early phase, the Politburo, the Presidium of the Central Control Commission, secretaries of regional committees as a result of the changes in the life of the party and the 18 Brumaire Stalin turned into a gang of unprincipled, cowardly become false and corrupt politicians, and Stalin in an unlimited and irremovable dictator exhibiting ten times more blunt arbitrariness, tyranny and violence against the masses than any samoderzhav first monarch lies and slander, shootings and arrests, guns and machine guns, in all ways and means they will defend their dominance in the party and in the country, because they see them as their patrimony (M. Rutin, Manifest Union Conference Union Marxists-Leninists 1932). But the matter does not end there! Everything remains very serious to this day: the experience of the mass repressions in fact pushed out of the public consciousness. Consciously or unconsc iously, but the experience of tragedy and more persistently ignored, obscures, by all available means. Also among the naive comfort information bells and whistles of a new century, this experience gets easily: it remains unchanged FAILURE TO UNDERSTAND systematically terror and because this experience is merciless not only to the past but to the future. No one can guarantee that with regard to society state total terror will no longer be used as a universal tool extraction of surplus value (the economic content of repression, see here.). Interpretation of September 11, the cynicism of power ratings and Stalinism in this convincing. Shalamov about bulls Legion writes: The misfortune of the Russian literature in that it climbs own business, break peoples lives, speaking out on matters in which she did not understand anything. In a letter in 1972 Shalamov wrote bluntly: Solzhenitsyn entire literary motives classics of the second half of the 19th century, all who follow Tolstoys precep ts liars, these teachers, poets, prophets, fiction writers can bring only harm. The conviction of Shalamov return can either AD, alas! His grim prediction of it based on the fact they do not realize the main lesson of the 20th century in Russia - lesson exposure of the animal at the beginning of most humanist concept.